The John Edwards Affair
65A Dear John Letter
Dear John,
Like many women on the left, I once admired you as a politically progressive candidate for the country’s highest office. And, these feelings were underscored when you arrived in my small Iowa town as you campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination the fall of 2008. You positioned yourself as a voice for the working man and for the diminishing middle class being bled dry by the cooperate behemoth that has put our nation in peril. Of course, I had heard you treated yourself to $400 haircuts and that should have put me on notice that perhaps you didn’t always walk your talk, but I let that slide because I liked your fight for universal health care and the fact you came from a working class family that faced the same struggles as most of us trying to make a living – we saw you fighting for the little guy.
John, affairs do have consequences.
I thought your wife, Elizabeth, was wonderful and admired her forthright and unscripted way of speaking with us as she held a Q and A meeting at our CivicCenter. Her unpretentious way—she was wearing pants and just a tad of makeup—made her seem like a woman we could all relate to. I’ll admit, I thought you were a bit of an odd couple because of the contrast between your classic movie star good looks (the $400 haircut just a bit too coiffed, in my opinion) and Elizabeth with her down home, middle aged mom, everywoman beauty. Also, she wasn’t skinny, and middle aged women seem to like that in other women. John, women love your wife. We were blown away she could fight breast cancer and still follow you all over the country on the campaign trail on behalf of the disenfranchised, making a strong case why you could lead us from the depths of the Bush Cheney hell. We wanted a more enlightened era of social fairness, a cleaner environment, and an end to the corporatized heath care nightmare of red tape and bureaucracy that is a death sentence for millions, even the so-called insured. Elizabeth was so obviously brilliant, connected to the people, and passionate about fighting for affordable healthcare for all, we admired her.
But, like many of my fellow Democrats, I was still on the fence. I was smitten by the charisma of the Senator from Illinois whose oratory gave me goose bumps. Barack Obama arrived at our Old Armory building where I shook his hand and asked him personally how he was different from you. I hoped I could be persuaded to move off the fence. “In terms of the rhetoric,” he answered, “we are pretty close. The difference is actually more about walking the talk.” Obama was as compelling up front and personal as he was in front of a crowd – he had the X factor, the mojo, the magic. I’ll admit, I was mesmerized, but still a bit undecided, and as I listened to your supporters and looked more closely at your platform, I discovered you were rated as more progressive than Obama. You fought the nuclear power industry and supported single payer health care. You views were more in line with mine on many issues. During your single term representing North Carolina in the U.S. Senate, you only received a 63 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters -- a score lower than might have been expected because you missed a number of key votes while campaigning for president and vice president in 2003 and 2004. However, you were given kudos by environmentalists and the left for being more aggressive on the issue of climate change than other Democratic candidates—they later ended up following your lead. And, after listening to you speak at our 2nd Street Café at 8 a.m. one morning, I ended up caucusing for you. And, John, I was thrilled when my little precinct voted for you. While at the end of the day, Iowa went to Obama, I still felt good about having supported you.
I did move forward and enthusiastically supported Barack Obama’s campaign in Iowa, and was thrilled when he won the election in 2009. Of course, I didn’t understand until later, when your affair with Rielle Hunter (aka Lisa Hunter) who was filming your political career made headlines, how lucky a vulnerable Democratic Party and county in crisis was that you lost the nomination for President. I was pretty surprised that Elizabeth, who knew about your affair before you ran, supported your decision to go for it anyway. Really, you know no stone is left unturned in this day and age. You shouldn’t have put your supporters at risk.
After all John, you and Elizabeth are no strangers to the world of politics, and you should know that a candidate’s dirty laundry is destined for a public showing. You should have known your party and your supporters would become the recipients of potentially devastating blow-back. Had you been nominated and the news of your close encounters with a third party made public, we could now be a country under the influence of John McCain and his running mate, the intellectually and morally challenged Fox television star and Rush Limbaugh supporter, Sarah Palin.
John, affairs do have consequences. And, while most often, the consequences are of a more personal nature, they are sometimes of a far more reaching nature. Sometimes they can change the course of history, and your decision to run for the highest office knowing there was not only the possibility of, but the probability of, the opposition calling you out in one of history’s most consequential elections, was unconscionable. John, you were a very bad boy, and I’m not talking about your affair. That is not my business. You know the media lies in waiting to expose the sexual indiscretions of politicians in hopes of igniting a fiery media circus to increase its insatiable desire for ratings. I’m referring to your decision to put your country at risk by choosing to run for the Presidency when you had a target on your back, to your dishonesty, to grasping for power at the expense of the people you claim to fight for.
CommentsLoading...
It appears Edwards did not only cheat on his wife, but on his supporters as well. As you point out, he knew he was vulnerable but let his ego convince him he could get away with it. An America with Palin within spitting distance of real power? OMG - what a nightmare!
A beautifully written hub and I Stumbled it as a thumbs up. Glad you're back. Missed you nice sharp wit. Lynda
kartika! I always enjoy your "voice" in these sort of hubs. I usually do not comment on anything to do with politics because I'm often confused by the whole thing! ha BUT I do appreciate when women like you speak out and make good points. It is really sad when something like this affair takes away the media from much more important issues...Best, G
This morning related questions popped into my head. Have we reached a place where only those who follow a certain narrow path of behaviour need apply for public office? Is it the electorate's right to know intimate details of a candidate's life? There are those who suggest that as a representative of a portion of the population, the candidate should represent the mores of his constituents, but possessed of a rather dark view of humanity and human behaviour, I wonder if Edwards isn't exactly that. Further, as his wife seemed to have no problem with the situation prior to the publicity (which I have trouble imagining), why should we?
Your thoughts?
Kartika, I'm just glad that he wasn't elected president. That would have been a tough one for the Democrats. Edwards was into the anti-poverty movement which seemed like such a good thing but I always thought he was a phony. Like the lady above, to each his own, but it would not have gone down well with the American populace and would have given the right wing a big hammer.
I saw Jenny Sanford on ABC this morning with George Stephanopoulis. http://www.thestate.com/136/story/1147436.html?sto Another politician who deceived his wife and constituents...
Is ego the key word here? I figure people like Edwards and now Palin will "say, be and do anything" to get elected. The Prize is The Win, not The Conviction. Sadly but happily the mechanism we call caucusing saw through him when I didn't. Hope it works the same for Palin.
Hi kartika -- back again. I read your response and thought about while I was cleaning up the garage. Then it hit me, what it is about this whole question that bothers me so. You say Americans don't like infidelity, especially when it involves sneaking around... Well, the truth is, they may not like or accept it in their public officials, but they certainly seem to practice it more than most. Marital statistics in the U.S. are scarey, and many Americans have become serial marryers. Fidelity is the minority. So once again we see that all too American trait -- strong belief in the myth, not the reality.
As for Elizabeth, who says she is devastated -- funny she wasn't devastated before all the publicity. Here is another great myth -- the all sacrificing woman. Excuse me a minute -- I must go and vomit.
And while this travesty play on in the eye of the media, we all suck it in and say, "Well look how the mighty have fallen." We turn and say self-righteously to our second, third or fourth spouses, "How could he/she?" Our spouses, freshly home and still damp behind the ears from the shower following their latest tryst nod in agreement.
Yes, I think the man was a fool and an egotistical one at that, to think his opposition would let him sail on through all squeaky clean.
But the finger-pointing, public tells-all-the-juicy-facts media feeding frenzy is noxious. Particularly following so hard on the heels of Tiger Woods.
To quote Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, who once stated, the government has no place in the bedrooms of the nation. May I suggest the reverse is also true.
Thanks for letting me mount my soap box again, and I look forward to your thought.
Hypocrisy -- which is exactly my point. Seems to me we're on the same page.












papajack 2 years ago
Well said Kartika. The old saying about power corrupts is still true. So is another on "Buyer Beware."